 |
From the catacombs to the palace. The question is whether the church gained the world or lost its soul. |
The church that turned the Roman Empire upside down was born in a borrowed upper room, grew in catacombs, was watered with the blood of martyrs and spread across the known world through people who owned almost nothing and feared no one. It had no buildings, no political allies, no state protection and no institutional power. What it had was the Holy Spirit, the Word of God and a willingness to die for both.
For
nearly three centuries, this church was hunted. Emperors tried to exterminate
it. Lions were fed with its members. Crosses and stakes and arenas received its
leaders. And the more it was persecuted, the more it grew. By the early fourth
century, Christians represented somewhere between ten and fifteen percent of
the Roman Empire's population, somewhere in the range of six to seven million
people, despite systematic, empire-wide attempts to destroy them.
And
then something happened that the church had never experienced before. The
empire stopped fighting it. And started embracing it.
At
first glance, it looked like the greatest victory in church history. In
reality, it was the beginning of one of the greatest corruptions.
This
post will not be comfortable. It is not designed to be. Because the story of
what happened to the church after Constantine is not ancient history sitting
safely in the past. It is a mirror held up to the church of today. And the
reflection, for anyone willing to look honestly, is deeply troubling.
Mixture has always been an abomination to God. It was in
the Old Testament. It was in 325 AD. And it is in 2026.
Part One: The Pattern God Established Before Constantine Was Born
To
understand why the Constantinian compromise was so catastrophic, you must first
understand something that runs like a red thread through the entire Old
Testament: God has never, in any era of human history, tolerated mixture
between His covenant people and the values, worship and systems of the world
around them. Never. Not once. And every time His people attempted it, the
consequences were devastating.
This
is not a minor biblical theme that can be noted and moved past quickly. It is
one of the central preoccupations of the entire Old Testament. God returns to
it with prophets, with judgments, with exile, with restoration and with warning
after warning that falls on ears that keep choosing not to hear.
Israel
and the Baals: The First Great Mixture
From
the moment Israel entered Canaan, God's instructions were unambiguous. They
were not to intermarry with the Canaanite nations. They were not to make
covenants with them. They were not to allow their gods to remain in the land.
The reason God gave was not cultural superiority. It was spiritual
contamination. He knew exactly what would happen if His people got close enough
to foreign worship systems to smell the incense and hear the rituals.
Deuteronomy 7:3-4 states it plainly:
"Neither
shalt thou make marriages with them; thy daughter thou shalt not give unto his
son, nor his daughter shalt thou take unto thy son. For they will turn away thy
son from following me, that they may serve other gods: so will the anger of the
LORD be kindled against you, and destroy thee suddenly."
— Deuteronomy 7:3-4 (KJV)
Israel
did not listen. Judges is essentially a long, painful record of Israel
repeatedly compromising with Canaanite culture and worship, suffering the
consequences, crying out to God, being delivered, and then repeating the cycle.
The book of Judges does not read like ancient history. It reads like the modern
church's annual report.
By
the time of Elijah, the mixture had reached crisis point. Under Ahab and
Jezebel, Baal worship had been institutionalised in Israel. Altars to Baal
stood alongside altars to Yahweh. The people were not atheists. They had not
rejected God outright. They were trying to worship both. And Elijah's famous
challenge at Mount Carmel in 1 Kings 18:21 names the precise spiritual
condition that mixture produces:
"And
Elijah came unto all the people, and said, How long halt ye between two
opinions? if the LORD be God, follow him: but if Baal, then follow him. And the
people answered him not a word." — 1 Kings 18:21 (KJV)
How
long halt ye between two opinions? The people answered not a word. Mixture does
not produce confident, clear, spiritually decisive people. It produces
confused, double-minded, spiritually paralysed people who cannot answer a
direct question about who they actually serve. That silence is one of the most
damning descriptions of a compromised people in all of Scripture. And it
describes millions of modern churchgoers with uncomfortable precision.
Solomon:
When the Wisest Man Built Altars to Demons
Solomon
is perhaps the most instructive case study in the catastrophic power of
mixture. Here was a man who had been visited by God twice. A man to whom God
had given wisdom beyond any human being who ever lived. A man who built the
most magnificent temple to Yahweh that the world had ever seen. A man whose
prayer of dedication at that temple is one of the most theologically
magnificent prayers in the entire Old Testament.
And
yet. 1 Kings 11:1-8 records the unravelling:
"For
it came to pass, when Solomon was old, that his wives turned away his heart
after other gods: and his heart was not perfect with the LORD his God, as was
the heart of David his father. For Solomon went after Ashtoreth the goddess of
the Zidonians, and after Milcom the abomination of the Ammonites. And Solomon
did evil in the sight of the LORD, and went not fully after the LORD, as did
David his father." — 1 Kings 11:4-6 (KJV)
Seven
hundred wives. Three hundred concubines. Most of them from nations God had
explicitly forbidden. And each one brought her gods with her. Solomon did not
start out as an idolater. He ended as one because he allowed mixture into his
life progressively, incrementally, in small enough doses that no single
compromise felt catastrophic, until one day the wisest man in the world was
building high places to Chemosh and Molech, gods to whom children were burned
alive, right outside Jerusalem.
If
mixture could do that to Solomon, it can do it to anyone. It can do it to a
church. It can do it to a denomination. It can do it to a generation of
believers who make peace with the world a little at a time until the world is
fully at home inside the sanctuary.
The
Prophets: God's Consistent Verdict on Mixture
Every
major writing prophet in the Old Testament addressed mixture. Hosea compared
Israel's spiritual adultery to a faithless wife. Isaiah called the leaders of
Israel rulers of Sodom and compared the nation to Gomorrah because of their
religious corruption mixed with social injustice. Jeremiah wept over a people
who had forsaken the fountain of living waters and hewn out broken cisterns
(Jeremiah 2:13), the image of a people who had traded the real thing for a
man-made substitute that could not hold water.
Ezekiel
saw a vision of the abominations being committed inside the temple itself,
idols in the inner court, women weeping for Tammuz at the north gate, men
worshipping the sun with their backs to the temple of God (Ezekiel 8). The
mixture had moved from the outskirts of Israelite life all the way into the
holy of holies.
And
God's response in every case was the same. He did not negotiate with the
mixture. He did not find a theological framework to accommodate it. He judged
it. The northern kingdom of Israel was taken into Assyrian captivity in 722 BC,
never to return as a distinct nation. The southern kingdom of Judah was taken
to Babylon in 586 BC, the temple destroyed, the city burned and the people
scattered. The consequences of sustained, unrepentant mixture were total and
catastrophic.
God
had established the pattern clearly and irrevocably long before Constantine was
born. Mixture between His people and the world's systems, values and worship is
not a minor pastoral concern to be managed with sensitivity. It is an
existential threat to the spiritual life of God's people. He has judged it
every single time it has appeared. And He does not change.
 |
Israel tried to worship both Yahweh and Baal. God called it adultery. The church has repeated the same mistake |
Part Two: Constantine and the Catastrophic Compromise of 312 AD
Gaius
Flavius Valerius Constantinus, known to history as Constantine the Great,
became the sole ruler of the Roman Empire in 324 AD after years of civil war
and political maneuvering. But the event that changed the church forever
happened twelve years earlier, in 312 AD, on the eve of the Battle of the
Milvian Bridge.
According
to Constantine's own account, reported by the church historian Eusebius of
Caesarea, he saw a vision of a cross of light in the sky with the words In
hoc signo vinces: in this sign, conquer. He placed the Christian symbol on
his soldiers' shields. He won the battle. And Christianity, which had been a
persecuted movement for nearly three centuries, suddenly had the most powerful
man in the world as its patron.
In
313 AD, Constantine issued the Edict of Milan, granting religious tolerance
throughout the empire and specifically ending the persecution of Christians.
Church property that had been confiscated was returned. Christians were
permitted to worship openly. The empire that had fed them to lions was now
building them basilicas.
To a
church that had known nothing but persecution for nearly three hundred years,
this must have felt like the fulfilment of prophecy. Like the kingdom of God
advancing. Like victory.
It
was not victory. It was a trap. And the church walked into it with open arms.
The most dangerous moment for the church is not when the
world persecutes it. It is when the world embraces it.
Part Three: The Consequences - What the Church Lost When It Gained the Empire
Consequence
1: The Merger of Church and State
Before
Constantine, the church had no political power and wanted none. Its citizenship
was heavenly (Philippians 3:20). Its kingdom was not of this world (John
18:36). Its weapons were not carnal (2 Corinthians 10:4). The early church
understood, with a clarity that the post-Constantinian church quickly lost,
that the gospel advances not through political alliance and institutional power
but through the Holy Spirit, the Word of God and the willingness of ordinary
people to lay down their lives for truth.
After
Constantine, the church became progressively entangled with the machinery of
the Roman state. Bishops were given legal authority. Church councils were
convened and presided over by the emperor. Orthodoxy became a matter of
imperial policy. To be Roman was increasingly to be Christian, not because of
genuine conversion but because of cultural and political pressure.
This
merger had consequences that echo to this day. When the church and the state
share a bed, the church always ends up serving the state's agenda more than the
state serves the church's mission. Political power corrupts spiritual vision.
An institution that depends on government favour cannot afford to speak
prophetically against the government. And a church that cannot speak
prophetically is not a church. It is a religious department of the state.
The
prophet Micah described what happens to spiritual leaders who allow political
alliance to compromise their message:
"The
heads thereof judge for reward, and the priests thereof teach for hire, and the
prophets thereof divine for money: yet will they lean upon the LORD, and say,
Is not the LORD among us? none evil can come upon us."
— Micah 3:11 (KJV)
Preaching
for hire. Prophesying for money. Judging for reward. And all the while claiming
God's presence and protection. This is not only a description of eighth century
BC Israel. It is a description of what political Christianity produces in every
era it appears.
Consequence
2: The Institutionalisation and Corruption of the Church
The
early church met in homes. It had no professional clergy class. Its leaders
were recognised by their spiritual gifts, their character and their service,
not by their institutional position or their educational credentials. The New
Testament knows nothing of a sharp distinction between clergy and laity. Every
believer was a priest (1 Peter 2:9). Every member had a function in the body (1
Corinthians 12).
After
Constantine, the church rapidly developed into a hierarchical institution
modelled on Roman administrative structures. A professional clergy emerged with
titles, robes, privileges and power. The laity became passive recipients of
religious services performed by specialists. The bishop of Rome began
accumulating influence that would eventually become the papacy, an institution
with more in common with Roman imperial administration than with the servant
leadership Jesus modelled in John 13.
By
the time of Pope Leo I in the mid-fifth century, the bishop of Rome was
claiming universal jurisdiction over all Christians everywhere, a claim with no
basis in the New Testament but with a very clear basis in Roman imperial
political theory. The church had not just received the empire's blessing. It
had adopted the empire's structure, its power dynamics and its institutional ambitions.
Jesus
said in Matthew 20:25-26:
"Ye
know that the princes of the Gentiles exercise dominion over them, and they
that are great exercise authority upon them. But it shall not be so among you:
but whosoever will be great among you, let him be your minister."
— Matthew 20:25-26 (KJV)
It
shall not be so among you. Jesus was not describing a cultural preference. He
was drawing a line. The leadership model of the Gentile world, hierarchical,
power-based, title-driven and dominion-oriented, was explicitly excluded from
the church. Constantine's church erased that line completely. And the
institutional church that emerged from the Constantinian era has been
struggling to find it ever since.
Consequence
3: The Introduction of Pagan Elements into Christian Worship
This
is perhaps the most visible and most studied consequence of the Constantinian
compromise. When the empire became Christian in name, it brought its pagan
religious culture with it. And rather than confronting and cleansing that
culture, the post-Constantinian church accommodated it, baptised it and gave it
Christian names.
The
veneration of saints absorbed elements of the Roman veneration of local gods
and heroes. Specific saints were assigned patronage over specific activities,
professions and locations, a direct parallel to the Roman practice of assigning
specific deities to specific domains. The use of statues and images in worship,
explicitly condemned throughout the Old Testament and absent from early
Christian practice, entered the church as a concession to populations
accustomed to visual religious representation.
December
25th, the date celebrated as Christ's birth, has no basis in the New Testament
text and was almost certainly chosen to coincide with the Roman festival of Sol
Invictus, the Unconquered Sun, a major pagan winter celebration. Easter, while
rooted in the genuine historical resurrection, absorbed elements of spring
fertility celebrations. The word Easter itself is connected by some historians
to Eostre, a Germanic spring goddess, though this remains debated.
Temples
dedicated to Roman gods were consecrated as Christian churches, sometimes with
minimal alteration to their structure, imagery and ritual atmosphere. Pagan
feast days were rebranded as Christian holy days. The incense, the robes, the
processions, the hierarchical priesthood, the sacred spaces restricted to the
clergy, all of these had far more in common with Roman religious culture than
with the New Testament church.
This
is not obscure historical trivia. This is the documented, traceable process by
which pagan religious elements entered Christianity and have remained embedded
in various forms of institutional Christianity to this day. The mixture that
God judged repeatedly in Israel had found a new home. And this time it was
wearing a cross.
Consequence
4: The Politicisation of Doctrine
In
325 AD, Constantine convened the Council of Nicaea, the first ecumenical
council of the church. The primary agenda was the Arian controversy: Arius, a
popular Alexandrian priest, had been teaching that Jesus was a created being,
the first and greatest of God's creations, but a creation nonetheless and
therefore not co-equal or co-eternal with the Father.
The
council produced the Nicene Creed, affirming the full divinity of Christ, which
was theologically correct and historically important. But the process by which
it was produced set a precedent that was deeply problematic. The emperor
presided. Political pressure influenced the outcomes. Bishops who refused to
sign the creed were exiled. Doctrinal orthodoxy became a matter of imperial
enforcement.
Think
about what this means. The determination of Christian doctrine, which had
previously been a matter of careful, Spirit-led engagement with the apostolic
writings by communities of believers, was now subject to the political
calculations of a Roman emperor who had his own reasons for wanting religious
unity across his empire. Theological truth became entangled with political
convenience.
When
the state controls the definition of orthodoxy, it is no longer truth that
determines what is orthodox. It is power. And power, as history has
demonstrated with sickening consistency, has never been a reliable guardian of
biblical truth.
Consequence
5: The Shift from a Movement to an Institution
The
most fundamental and far-reaching consequence of the Constantinian shift was
the transformation of the church from a living, Spirit-driven movement into a
religious institution. And the difference between these two things is not
merely structural. It is spiritual.
A
movement is defined by its mission. Its energy comes from the Holy Spirit. Its
membership is composed of people who have genuinely chosen to be part of it at
personal cost. Its leaders are servants. Its boundaries are maintained by
genuine conversion and genuine discipleship.
An
institution is defined by its structures. Its energy comes from organisational
momentum and self-preservation. Its membership is composed of everyone within
its geographical or cultural reach, regardless of personal conviction. Its
leaders are administrators. Its boundaries are maintained by cultural identity
and institutional belonging rather than by genuine faith.
Before
Constantine, to be a Christian was to have made a costly choice. You knew what
you were signing up for. Persecution. Social exclusion. Possible death. The
church was self-selecting in the most radical possible way. The nominal and the
genuine could not long coexist in an environment where genuine faith cost you
everything.
After
Constantine, to be a Christian was the default option for anyone living in the
Roman Empire who wanted to get along socially and politically. The church went
from a body of committed disciples to a population of cultural adherents
overnight. Nominalism, the condition of being Christian in name without being
transformed in heart, became not the exception but the norm.
And with nominalism came everything that genuine faith was never designed to coexist with: compromise, worldliness, political ambition, moral laxity, spiritual indifference and the slow replacement of the fear of God with the fear of social disapproval.
 |
The bigger the building got, the emptier the pews became. Institutions do not move the world. Movements do. |
Part Four: The Modern Church - Constantine's Legacy in 2026
If
you think the Constantinian compromise is a chapter that closed in the fourth
century, you have not been paying attention to the modern church. The same
spirit of mixture that entered with Constantine is alive, well-dressed,
microphone in hand, and filling auditoriums across the world today. It has
simply updated its wardrobe.
The
Prosperity Gospel: Mixture with Materialism
The
prosperity gospel is one of the most successful and most spiritually
destructive mixtures in the history of Christianity. It takes the genuine
biblical truth that God is a provider and a blesser and mixes it thoroughly
with the values of Western consumer capitalism, producing a theology that makes
wealth the primary evidence of God's favour and poverty the primary evidence of
weak faith or sin.
In
this mixture, the cross becomes an investment. Tithing becomes a financial
transaction with guaranteed returns. Jesus becomes a wealth coach. And the
sermon on the mount, with its beatitudes for the poor in spirit, the mourning,
the meek and the persecuted, becomes an embarrassment to be explained away or
ignored entirely.
The
prosperity gospel does not come from the Bible. It comes from the merger of
Christianity with the materialist values of the world around it. It is Baal
worship in a suit. Baal was the god of fertility, abundance and material
prosperity. His worshippers served him because they believed he controlled the
rain, the harvest and the increase of their flocks. The prosperity gospel
offers Jesus as a more powerful and more accessible version of the same
transaction. Give to receive. Sow to harvest. Confess wealth into existence.
Jesus
said in Matthew 6:24:
"No
man can serve two masters: for either he will hate the one, and love the other;
or else he will hold to the one, and despise the other. Ye cannot serve God and
mammon." — Matthew 6:24 (KJV)
The
prosperity gospel attempts to serve both God and mammon simultaneously and
calls it faith. Jesus called it impossible.
Political
Christianity: Mixture with Power
Constantine's
most enduring legacy is the idea that the church's influence in society is best
secured through political power. This idea has never left the church. It simply
migrates from era to era, from empire to empire, wearing different political
colours in different contexts.
Today
it manifests as the reduction of the gospel to a political platform. As
preachers who are more passionate about which political party wins an election
than about whether their congregation is genuinely born again. As churches that
have become effectively the religious wing of a political movement, so
thoroughly identified with a particular political agenda that the gospel itself
has been subordinated to the agenda.
When
the church becomes the chaplain of a political party, it loses its prophetic
voice. It can no longer speak truth to power because it is too busy providing
religious cover for power. It can no longer call sinners to repentance because
the sinners in power are its political allies. It becomes, in the precise words
of Micah 3:11, a prophet that divines for money, a priest that teaches for
hire.
The
gospel of Jesus Christ is not conservative or liberal, Republican or Democrat,
APC or PDP. It is the power of God unto salvation for everyone who believes
(Romans 1:16). The moment it is harnessed to a political agenda it ceases to be
the gospel and becomes propaganda.
Entertainment-Driven
Worship: Mixture with Secular Culture
Walk
into many churches today and you will find a production. Stage lighting
designed to create emotional atmosphere. Music calibrated for maximum audience
response. Preachers who have studied stand-up comedy as much as Scripture,
because they know that if they can make the congregation laugh, they can keep
them engaged. Comedians invited to minister from pulpits. Drama performances,
some indistinguishable from secular theatre, presented as worship.
None
of these things are categorically wrong in isolation. Creativity in worship is
not sinful. The problem is when the driving question in a church service shifts
from what does God require to what will keep the audience coming
back. When entertainment becomes the primary currency of church life, you
have already conceded the most important ground. You have admitted that the
Holy Spirit alone is not enough to attract and hold people. That the presence
of God needs to be augmented with the production values of the world to be
tolerable.
The
early church had no stage lights. No sound systems. No comedians. No theatrical
performances. What they had was so real, so weighty and so genuinely
supernatural that people fell on their faces and cried out that God was truly
among them (1 Corinthians 14:25). That is not a description of an audience
being entertained. That is a description of people being encountered by the
living God.
When
the church trades the encounter for the entertainment, it does not gain the
world. It loses the presence.
Syncretism
with Traditionalism: Mixture with Ancestral Worship
In
the African context particularly, and it must be named because BereanLook is
written from and to this context, one of the most spiritually dangerous forms
of mixture is the growing accommodation of traditional religious practices
within Christian worship.
There
are churches today where masquerades are invited to perform at church
programmes. Where libations are poured as part of services described as
Christian. Where the veneration of ancestors is blended with prayer to God as
though they are compatible. Where the fear of curses from family deities is
held simultaneously with a claimed faith in the finished work of Christ on the
cross.
This
is not cultural sensitivity. This is spiritual adultery. The God of the Bible
has never shared His altar with any other spirit, deity or spiritual power.
Deuteronomy 32:16-17 describes what happens when His people offer worship to
other spirits:
"They
provoked him to jealousy with strange gods, with abominations provoked they him
to anger. They sacrificed unto devils, not to God; to gods whom they knew not,
to new gods that came newly up, whom your fathers feared not."
— Deuteronomy 32:16-17 (KJV)
They
sacrificed unto devils. This is God's own interpretation of syncretistic
worship. Not cultural expression. Not innocent tradition. Sacrifice to devils.
The New Testament confirms this interpretation in 1 Corinthians 10:20: the
things which the Gentiles sacrifice, they sacrifice to devils, and not to God:
and I would not that ye should have fellowship with devils.
A
church that allows traditional religious practices to coexist with Christian
worship has not contextualised the gospel. It has corrupted it. And the people
sitting in those services are not receiving the liberation of the cross. They
are receiving a spiritual cocktail that leaves them bound to the very powers
the cross came to set them free from.
The
Worldly Church: When the World Moves In and the Spirit Moves Out
Beyond
these specific expressions, there is a general condition of the modern church
that must be named plainly. The world has moved into the church. Not just its
music and its entertainment but its values, its ethics, its priorities and its
atmosphere.
The
sexual ethics of the surrounding culture have entered many churches to the
point where the biblical standard of sexual purity is considered extreme,
unrealistic or even harmful. Divorce rates among churchgoers in many countries
are indistinguishable from those of the general population. Cohabitation before
marriage is treated as a lifestyle choice rather than a departure from God's
design. In some denominations, sexual ethics have been revised entirely to
accommodate cultural pressure, with the approval of relationships and
lifestyles that the Scripture unambiguously defines as sin.
The
result is a church that has lost its saltiness. Jesus warned about this in
Matthew 5:13:
"Ye
are the salt of the earth: but if the salt have lost his savour, wherewith
shall it be salted? it is thenceforth good for nothing, but to be cast out, and
to be trodden under foot of men." — Matthew 5:13
(KJV)
Good
for nothing. Trodden under foot. This is Jesus describing the church that has
accommodated the world to the point of losing its distinctiveness. And the devastating
reality is that a church that looks, sounds, thinks and behaves like the world
around it has nothing to offer the world. You cannot give what you no longer
have. You cannot call people out of a condition you have made yourself
comfortable in.
The
church is supposed to be the pillar and ground of truth (1 Timothy 3:15). It is
supposed to be the city set on a hill, the light of the world, the community
that demonstrates what human life looks like when it is genuinely ordered
around the kingdom of God. Instead, the mixture has produced a church that is
indistinguishable from its surroundings, not because the world has been
transformed by the gospel but because the church has been transformed by the
world.
Constantine did not conquer the church with a sword. He
conquered it with an embrace. The world is doing the same thing today. And the
church is welcoming it.
Part Five: What Must Be Done
The
question this post must answer is not only diagnostic. What happened? Why is it
bad? Those questions have been answered. The prophetic word always ends with a
call. What must be done?
The
Church Must Recover Its Distinctiveness
The
church is not the world. It never was and it was never supposed to be. Its
citizenship is different. Its values are different. Its Lord is different. Its
power source is different. Its destination is different. A church that has
forgotten its distinctiveness has forgotten its identity. And a church without
identity has no mission.
Peter
describes what the church is in 1 Peter 2:9:
"But
ye are a chosen generation, a royal priesthood, an holy nation, a peculiar
people; that ye should shew forth the praises of him who hath called you out of
darkness into his marvellous light." — 1 Peter 2:9
(KJV)
A
peculiar people. Not peculiar in the sense of strange for its own sake.
Peculiar in the sense of set apart, owned, distinctive. The Greek word is peripoiesis:
a possession, something specially acquired. The church belongs to God in a way
that distinguishes it from everything else in the world. That distinction is
not something to be embarrassed about, managed carefully or gradually eroded
for the sake of relevance. It is the source of the church's power and the basis
of its mission.
The
Church Must Separate from What God Has Separated From
This
is the direct instruction of the New Testament on the matter of mixture. Not
suggestion. Instruction. And it comes from Paul writing to a church in the most
cosmopolitan, pluralistic, religiously diverse city in the ancient world:
"Be
ye not unequally yoked together with unbelievers: for what fellowship hath
righteousness with unrighteousness? and what communion hath light with
darkness? And what concord hath Christ with Belial? or what part hath he that
believeth with an infidel? And what agreement hath the temple of God with
idols? for ye are the temple of the living God; as God hath said, I will dwell
in them, and walk in them; and I will be their God, and they shall be my
people. Wherefore come out from among them, and be ye separate, saith the Lord,
and touch not the unclean thing; and I will receive you."
— 2 Corinthians 6:14-17 (KJV)
What
fellowship hath righteousness with unrighteousness? What communion hath light
with darkness? What concord hath Christ with Belial? The questions answer
themselves. None. Zero. No fellowship. No communion. No concord. No agreement.
No mixture.
And
the command that follows from this reality is unambiguous: come out from
among them and be ye separate. This is not isolationism. The church must be
in the world to reach the world. But it must not be of the world. It must not
be shaped by the world. It must not be indistinguishable from the world. The
difference between being in the world and being of the world is the difference
between a missionary and a casualty.
The
Church Must Return to the Power That Requires No Supplement
The
early church did not need Constantine. It did not need political power,
institutional prestige, state protection or cultural accommodation to turn the
Roman Empire upside down. It needed the Holy Spirit and the Word of God. And it
had both.
The
desperate search for relevance, the entertainment, the political alliances, the
accommodation of worldly values, all of it is a symptom of the same underlying
condition: a church that has lost confidence in the power of the Holy Spirit
and the Word of God to do what only the Holy Spirit and the Word of God can do.
When you believe the presence of God is enough, you stop supplementing it with
the world's tools. When you lose confidence in the presence of God, you start
reaching for everything else.
"Not
by might, nor by power, but by my spirit, saith the LORD of hosts."
— Zechariah 4:6 (KJV)
Not
by might. Not by power. Not by political alliance, institutional prestige,
entertainment value, cultural accommodation or any other supplement the church
has reached for since the fourth century. By My Spirit. The church that returns
to this reality, that strips away the Constantinian additions and the worldly
supplements and stands nakedly dependent on the Holy Spirit and the Word of
God, is the church that will turn its generation upside down. Just as the
pre-Constantinian church turned its generation upside down.
Not
before. After. The church that was hunted, poor, powerless by the world's
standards and filled with the Holy Spirit was the most powerful social force in
the history of the ancient world. The church that received empire, wealth,
political power and institutional prestige began a long decline that has not
fully reversed to this day.
The
lesson of Constantine is not subtle. It is not complex. It does not require a
theology degree to understand. It is this: the world cannot save the church.
The world can only corrupt it.
The church that chases the world's approval will always
lose both the world and God. The church that pursues God's presence will always
reach the world in spite of itself.
Back to the Text. Every Time.
BereanLook | bereanlook.com
Join the
Conversation
What
expressions of mixture do you see most clearly in the church around you? What
do you think it will take for the church to recover its distinctiveness and its
power? Share your thoughts in the comments below. This conversation is too
important to leave to the professionals.
If
this post has stirred something in you, share it. Someone in your circle needs
to read it. Subscribe to BereanLook for daily posts at 7:00 AM WAT and send
your questions through the Reader Questions contact form at bereanlook.com.
Related Posts on BereanLook:
•
The Doctrine of God: Who IsGod and What Do We Actually Know About Him? Part 1
•
Can a Born-Again BelieverLose Salvation? The Debate That Has Divided the Church for Centuries
•
Salvation: What Does the
Word Actually Mean? A Deep Dive into Sozo, Soteria and Yeshua
Coming Next:
•
Is Tithing a New Testament
Obligation? What the Text Actually Says
•
The Prosperity Gospel: Is
God's Will Always for Believers to Be Wealthy and Healthy?
